Evaluation
Christopher Columbus Middle School
Dinosaur PowerPoint Presentation
Name:
______________________
Teacher:
_____________________
Date Submitted: _______________________
Title of Work: ______________________
| Categories |
Exemplary 4 |
Accomplished 3 |
Developing 2 |
Beginning 1 |
Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Process: |
All questions were answered completely and reasons for the answers were clearly stated. |
All questions were answered completely, but reasons for all the answers were not clearly stated. |
Not all questions were answered completely, or greater than 2 reasons for all the answers were not clearly stated. |
All questions were not answered completely. |
|
|
Process: Teamwork
|
It is evident that a mutual effort and cohesive unit created the final product. |
The team worked well together, but could have utilized each other's skills to a better degree. |
The team had problems working together. Little collaboration occurred. |
The final product is not the result of a collaborative effort. The group showed no evidence of collaboration. |
|
|
Process: Originality
|
The ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrate a high degree of originality. |
The ideas expressed by the body of work are mostly original. The group may have improved upon a previous idea. |
The ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrate a low degree of originality. |
There were no original ideas expressed in this project. |
|
|
Grammar, Format , and Spelling |
The final body of work was free of grammar, spelling, and formatting errors. |
The final body of work had 1 error related to either grammar, spelling, or formatting errors. |
The final body of work had 3-5 grammar, spelling, and formatting errors. |
The final body of work had major grammar, spelling, and formatting errors. |
|
|
Individual Contributions
|
Routinely provides useful ideas when participating in the group and in classroom discussion. A definite leader who contributes a lot of effort. |
Usually provides useful ideas when participating in the group and in classroom discussion. A strong group member who tries hard! |
Sometimes provides useful ideas when participating in the group and in classroom discussion. A satisfactory group member who does what is required. |
Rarely provides useful ideas when participating in the group and in classroom discussion. May refuse to participate. |
|
|
Attitude |
Never is publicly critical of the project or the work of others. Always has a positive attitude about the task. |
Rarely is publicly critical of the project or the work of others. Often has a positive attitude about the task. |
Occasionally is publicly critical of the project or the work of other members of the group. Usually has a positive attitude about the task. |
Often is publicly critical of the project or the work of other members of the group. Often has a negative attitude about the task. |
|
|
Organization |
Information is very well organized and is easy to understand |
Information appears to be organized, but at times the ideas are confusing or unclear. |
Information is somewhat organized, but is confusing and difficult to understand. |
There appears to be little organization of the material. It is very confusing and distracting to others |
|
|
Amount of Information |
All Internet and written tasks are completed. |
All Internet tasks are completed, and most written assignments are completed. |
Most Internet and written tasks are completed. |
One or more Internet tasks were not addressed. |
|
|
Internet Use |
Easily accesses Internet sites; consistently locates meaningful information. |
Accesses Internet sites with minimal assistance; frequently locates meaningful information. |
Accesses Internet sites with occasional assistance; occasionally locates meaningful information. |
Needs frequent assistance to access Internet sites and locate meaningful information. |
|
|
Quality of Work |
Provides work of the highest quality. |
Provides high quality work. |
Provides work that occasionally needs to be revised and edited by other group members to ensure quality. |
Provides work that usually needs to be revised and edited by others to ensure quality. |
|
|
Presentation to the class |
Spoke clearly spoke as an expert on the dinosaur chosen |
Good report given knew the information |
Report was given in a manner which was hard to follow but it was obvious that the information was known |
No report given |
|
|
Quality of Poster (Either)
|
The project is creative & attractive. It is free of errors and is of the highest quality. |
The project is somewhat creative and attractive. It is free of most errors and is of high quality. |
The project is lacking in quality in one or more areas. It contains several errors. |
The project is lacking in quality in many areas. The work is sloppy and contains numerous errors. |
|
|
3D Model (or) |
3D handmade was placed in the correct environment creativity neat very elaborate |
3D handmade was placed in the correct environment neat |
3D handmade sloppy was placed in a habitat |
No project |
|
|
Total Points |
48 total points |
48-45= A
44-41= B
40-37= C |
|
|
|
Teacher Comments:
|
|
Powered by TeAch-nology.com- The Web Portal For Educators! (www.teach-nology.com) |
Home Introduction Task Process Resources Evaluation Conclusion Credits Teacher Page
SM/LL