Evaluation
| Home | Introduction | Task | Process | Evaluation | Conclusion | Teacher Page | Credits |
There will be an Individual Rubric for the individual task called Honing On Cloning and a Collaborative Assignment Grading Rubric for the debate and/or collaborative assignment.
Individual Rubric
|
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
|
Gather Information |
Information gathered has little or nothing to do with the questions posed.
|
Information gathered provides answers to main questions, but no details are given.
|
Information gathered provides answers to main questions along with 1-2 supporting details and/or examples.
|
Information gathered provides answers to the main questions along with several supporting details and/or examples for each. |
|
|
Definitions and Descriptions |
Most are present/correct and address basic facts. |
Most are complete and correct responses are detailed.
|
Includes previous criteria and definitions are complete and make sense.
|
Previous criteria and information relevant to definitions, descriptions and current issues.
|
|
|
Organization of Information
|
There appears to be little organization of the material.
|
Information is generally organized, but there is insufficient and unclear meaning presented.
|
Information is organized with some comparisons and contrasts.
|
Information is very well organized and demonstrates clear and substantial understanding of the differences and similarities of the subject.
|
|
The Collaborative Assignment Grading Rubric
|
|
1 Novice |
2 Developing |
3 Accomplished |
4 Expert |
|
Definitions and Descriptions |
Most are present/correct and address basic facts
|
Most are complete and correct responses are detailed |
Includes previous criteria and adds references |
|
|
Guiding Question # 4 Scientific/Medical Appropriateness
|
Responses are general and lack a clear opinion |
Responses include opinion without specific supporting data
|
States a well-developed opinion supported by 2 or more references |
Previous criteria and information relevant to current issues |
|
Guiding Question #5 Community Impact |
Responses are general and lack a clear opinion |
Responses include opinion without specific supporting data |
States a well-developed opinion supported by 2 or more references |
Previous criteria and defends position |
|
Guiding Question #6 Economical Impact |
Responses are general and lacks a clear opinion |
Responses include pro and con opinion without specific supporting data |
States a clear opinion for both sides of the issue and supports position with references. |
Previous criteria and defends position |
|
Guiding Question #7 Legal Issues |
Responses are general and lack a clear opinion |
Responses are relevant to each issue but lack supporting data
|
Clearly states opinion and is supported by 2 or more references |
Previous criteria and defends position |
|
Presentation |
Exhibits some oral presentation skills
|
Exhibits good oral presentation skills with organized notes |
Includes previous criteria and presents information within specified time frame |
Includes previous criteria, maintains eye contact, appropriate body language |
|
Group Interaction |
Some interaction present |
Participates with group members |
Team members work cooperatively all the time |
Includes previous criteria and actively supports individual team members |
Mary Cicitta, Marta A. Poznanska, Linda Zenkert